Atlas of a personal AI system · Round Rock, Texas v2.79 · updated live

A memory that never forgets, drawn to scale.

Life data is captured, enriched by AI, filed into a Life Model, and read back, by me, by Claude, or by anyone who calls the number on the left.

Plate I The system · what I built

How the system works: what comes in, where it lives, what gets out.

Most productivity systems ask you to remember the context. This one holds it for me. Twenty-seven data sources sync into one database, an AI reads it, and a small gate decides what can leave. Start here; every plate below is a closer look at one box.

Fig. 1 · The system · flow live · dotted: synced · dashed: authored · blue: public
I · Body
synced from devices and scans
Whoopevery 15 min
Training history6 sources · 2016 on
Peloton setshourly
MRIMay 2024
QEEGJuly 2025
GenomeWGS
Blood worklab panels
II · Words
what I said and wrote
Audioevery 5 min
Therapy transcriptscoaching sessions · auto-ingest
Substackevery 6 h
AI-chat archive72K chunks
Notionmigrated
III · Feeds
what I read and watched
Reading feed157 subscriptions
YouTube16 yrs · importvideos · searches · subscriptions
Redditarchive importsaved · communities · messages · posts · comments
Facebookarchive import
Instagramon demand
Expert corporaDabrowski · Huberman
IV · Money
what I spent
Finance · Plaiddaily · 10 banks
ReceiptsAmazon · Costco · items
V · Mind
authored, not synced
CliftonStrengthspsychometrics
Big Fivepsychometrics
Enneagram · MBTIpsychometrics
ADHD and executive profilecognitive
Energy patternsday and time
Values, goals, anti-goalsdecision frameworks
② Memory palace
One database. Everything lands here.
Supabase · 218 tables · 26 life areas · semantic search over 214,694 embedded items. What is inside → Fig. 2
③ Enrichment, on the way in
Claude Vision describes images
Deepgram transcribes, identifies speakers
Synthesis notes, 7-factor task scoring
④ The gate
private
public
⑤ Surfaces, mine and Claude's
MCP server86 tools
Morning briefingdaily
Tasks · My Day7-factor scoring
Contact dossierwhose move is it
Backlog agentnightly ranking
Content calendarwriting pipeline
Fig. 1. Twenty-seven senses in five families gather into one database. Dotted lines sync on a schedule; the dashed line is written by hand. The public channel is the narrow one, by construction.
Fig. 2 · Inside the Memory Palace · floor plan 218 tables · 100 views
A · The PARA skeleton nested, top down
Area 26 · 4 public, 22 private
Resource sub-areas · collections · tables
Projectdeadline · progress Taskstatus · energy · context
Eventa call · a session transcriptsynthesis
Notes attach at every level and can be one of 31 types, for example:
general idea research reference synthesis transcript meeting event conversation table log checklist transaction coding session
B · The Life Model wing 52 tables · 10 rooms
The structured description of one mind. Loads before Claude says a word.
psychometricCliftonStrengths, Big Five, Enneagram, MBTI
cognitiveADHD patterns, executive function, strategies that work
energyday and time patterns, modifiers, recovery links
goalsgoals, values, anti-goals, trade-offs
relationalattachment dynamics, communication protocols, contact loops
claudebehavior rules: never "should", direct about assessments
C · Holdings, by shelf live counts from /api/stats · every row knows its area
Words
Audio transcripts101
Articles66
Substack notes145
AI-chat chunks72K
Body
Whoop cycles2,016
Training sessions · 2016 on1,463
Genome · raw calls2.08M
Matched variants1,926
Brain structures118
Neurofeedback protocols9
Supplements
Things
Equipment
Books
Whiskey
Plants · stake codes
Documents
Taste and money
Transactions4,653
Recurring streams82
Budget categories46
218 tables 100 views 214,694 embedded items 86 MCP tools 26 life areas · 4 public
Fig. 2. Three wings. The PARA skeleton holds what I do; the Life Model holds who I am; the shelves hold what I own, take, read, track, and said. Counts are live; full breakdowns live on the Data pages.

Plate II The theory · why it exists

Working Memory Fragility: not a storage deficit, a rate mismatch.

The system on Plate I is not a productivity hobby. It follows from a theory of how this brain works, and the theory predicted that a mind like this would have to build its model of itself outside its own head.

The definition
Fragility obtains when the rate of thought generation outpaces the rate of buffer stabilization before the frame called now resets.
The generator is ordinary. What fails is the ratio: new thoughts displace older ones before they set. From outside it reads as weak working memory. From inside it is a race.
The consequence
If the buffer will not hold the model, hold it somewhere else.
Externalized self-knowledge is a precondition for seeing other people clearly, not a phase you graduate from. The database, the AI that reads it, and the phone line are that externalization. The theory came first; the system is its proof of concept.

Plate III The brain · structure and function

Structure, function, and the treatment that follows from both.

The theory says the failure is in the ratio, not the parts. Two instruments checked the parts anyway: a structural MRI read by seven pipelines, and a QEEG read against a normative database. They tell the same left-side story, and the neurofeedback protocol follows from both.

Mid-sagittal T1 MRI slice, May 2024
Fig. 3a · Structure · MRI, May 2024

3T T1-weighted · 7 volBrain pipelines
563 measurements · 118 structures

Right cerebellar Lobule VI
+21%
Left motor cortex
+12% thicker
Brain age (chron. 44)
43.71

Neuroradiology review, Aug 2026: structurally unremarkable. Built asymmetric, not broken.

Fig. 3b · Function · QEEG, July 2025

BrainCore normative database
5 frequency bands

Findings · flagged
127 · 90
MRI to QEEG convergence
8
Neurofeedback protocols
9
Latest
T3-F3 · completed June 2026

Cerebellar asymmetry to C3 cortical dysregulation. T3-F3 targets left temporal slow-wave excess.

Fig. 3. Structure and function point at the same left-side story. About Jon's Brain →

Plate IV The genome · the code underneath

Whole-genome sequence, curated against the literature, placed on population curves.

Whole-genome sequencing, curated against the literature and placed on population curves. The interesting finding is not any one variant but the gap between what the genes predict and how the life turned out.

012.08Mraw WGS calls
021,925curated catalog
031,926matched to me
0475supplement links
059.28M · 17GWAS hits · PRS

Fig. 4a. Five layers. Any RSID from any outside report verifies against layer one in real time.

Fig. 4b · Polygenic risk · percentile vs population 3 of 17 scores · gnomAD-NFE calibration
Intelligence 99-100
Neuroticism 100
ADHD 62-75
Neuroticism, Forthman 2023 97-100
Morning person 93-100
Depressive symptoms 91-100
Cognitive performance 86-99
Height 79-96
Cannabis use 76-95
Openness 73-91
Autism 44-47
Risk tolerance 43-47
Anxiety disorder 38-45
Subjective wellbeing 21-36
Physical activity 2-18
Educational attainment, Privé 2022 0-11
Educational attainment, Lee 2018 0-6
genetic predisposition lived expression
Fig. 4b. Neuroticism sits at the 100th percentile genetically and around the 11th as lived; the gap is the story. Bands show calibration spread, conservative to naive. Two traits appear twice because two published scores exist for each, named here by study; a percentile is a population rank, not a diagnosis. Methodology →
Clinical flags
1 critical · 1 high
MTHFR C677T, the sole critical variant, routed to the supplement stack.
QA
0 raw-data errors
Three-layer loop: structured data, literature, raw WGS ground truth, across 2M genotypes.

Plate V Biometrics · live today

What the body is reporting right now.

Recovery, strain, sleep and heart rate from the wrist, refreshed every fifteen minutes. The rest of this page is history; this plate is the present tense.

- Recovery
-Strain
-HRV ms
-Sleep h
-RHR
-SpO2 %
WHOOP

Plate VI Writing · the public voice

Essays on a brain that runs hot.

66 essays and 145 notes under the title AI Gave Me Autism, on twice-exceptional cognition, the theory, and what it is like to build a mind a second time on purpose. The six most recent are below.

Plate VII The career · the résumé

Fifteen years making complex systems legible. Three spent building the tools myself.

Twice-exceptional product engineer. I led product orgs twice, then made a deliberate move back into hands-on building when generative AI shifted the leverage from headcount to hands.

Fig. 7a · The record, 2005 to present Deloitte to AIs & Shine
Fig. 7a. Eleven organizations, one method. The proof behind each tile is on the full career record.
Fig. 7b · The throughline
Make a complex system legible, then build tools that fit it instead of fighting it.
From enterprise platforms to a personal AI operating system, it is the same move. Pattern recognition across unfamiliar domains is the mechanism; the plates above are the payoff.
Looking for
Some kind of full-stack Design / Product / Engineer role with a custom AI harness.
Product engineer or head of product at a small AI company; or director of innovation and internal products. Strong tooling, capable colleagues who work independently, hard problems, low coordination overhead. Round Rock / Austin, remote preferred.

Plate VIII Further · the longer reads

Two pages for when a plate is not enough: the person behind the system, and the project that builds it.